The WHSmith Data Breach: Why Employee Data Deserves Equal Protection
Organizations often forget that protecting customer data isn’t their only cybersecurity concern.
Last year, one of the UK's biggest retail organizations, WHSmith, suffered a data breach in which malicious actors accessed sensitive employee records.
While WHSmith did not disclose what happened to the stolen data, breaches involving employee PII often carry the risk of dark web resale or identity fraud.
Companies must understand that protecting internal systems and employees is just as important as safeguarding customer records, because one hole in the wall is all it takes for the storm to barge in.
Although WHSmith hasn’t released technical details regarding the attack, cybersecurity analysts speculated that poor network segmentation may have allowed lateral movement to internal HR systems, though this was not confirmed by WHSmith. Poor segmentation allows attackers to navigate through networks without much effort; in this case, there may have been a path between HR databases and other corporate assets, enabling access to sensitive employee records.
Stealing employee records is of great concern since the game of impersonation could come into play, which can allow hackers to access even more sensitive data, like customer records.
It is recommended that companies conduct frequent audits on their systems and keep their controls and frameworks updated to current requirements; they should not only safeguard their systems but also educate employees about security practices, since most cyberattacks happen through social engineering.
The true cause of the attack was never released, and neither was the perpetrator revealed. Netizens were left in the dark about the details of the incident. After the employees were informed, what were the next steps taken by WH Smith? Was this a ransomware attack? What happened to the exploited data?
The lack of follow-up disclosures from WH Smith left many questions unanswered, including whether the stolen data was ever recovered or contained. Could the reason behind the silence be something more troubling than we imagine?